WEBVTT
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:25.760
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to Beyond the DJ Booth Podcast.
00:00:25.839 --> 00:00:26.960
I'm Joe Bunn.
00:00:27.039 --> 00:00:28.640
That right there is Brian B.
00:00:29.120 --> 00:00:41.359
And today we have a first, an actual first, the very first guest, and it would have never been anyone else, the one, the only straight out of New Jersey, Mike Walter in the building.
00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:42.719
What's up, Mike?
00:00:49.600 --> 00:00:51.600
Thank you so much, gentlemen, for having me on.
00:00:51.679 --> 00:00:52.320
How are you?
00:00:52.479 --> 00:00:56.000
Dude, I I couldn't be more excited about this.
00:00:56.079 --> 00:01:06.879
I mean, I wish you could see the amount of technology and shit that we have been setting up for two days to get ready to bring on Mike Walter as the first guest.
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:11.200
You know, I actually I looked into flights to get down there and do this in person.
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:16.000
It just was impractical, especially because I'm gonna be in Vegas next week for wedding MBM.
00:01:16.079 --> 00:01:17.439
So it just was not gonna make sense.
00:01:17.519 --> 00:01:18.079
But I would have.
00:01:18.159 --> 00:01:20.239
If I could have, I would have hopped on a plane and been there in person.
00:01:20.319 --> 00:01:21.840
I love the setup, it looks awesome.
00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:22.799
Dude, thanks, man.
00:01:22.879 --> 00:01:26.640
We got the little set here, and we were able to hook up a little conference camera.
00:01:26.719 --> 00:01:29.280
And anyway, we are gonna talk about a lot of stuff today.
00:01:29.359 --> 00:01:31.840
We're not gonna put time constraints on this thing.
00:01:31.920 --> 00:01:40.400
Uh, if it goes longer than our normal 30 minutes, then of course it needs to for somebody of this stature, somebody that I've learned from, Brian's learned from.
00:01:41.359 --> 00:01:47.280
I it's probably the reason that I started speaking in the first place, which then led to the DJ's vault, which then led us here.
00:01:47.439 --> 00:01:50.799
He and I did a podcast, what, Mike, five years, 300 episodes?
00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:51.519
We did?
00:01:51.760 --> 00:01:52.799
We did a podcast.
00:01:52.959 --> 00:01:54.239
Dude, it's still out there.
00:01:54.400 --> 00:01:57.920
If you if you don't know about the PHDJ podcast, it is still out there.
00:01:58.079 --> 00:02:01.519
I think there are close to 300 episodes, and it was awesome.
00:02:01.599 --> 00:02:08.639
We called each other every week, uh, Mike being in New Jersey, me in North Carolina, and so again, happy to have him as the very first guest today.
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:10.400
Tell him what we're talking about, though, Brian.
00:02:10.479 --> 00:02:12.719
You want to tell them about why Mike is on?
00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:17.759
I mean, he's on for multiple reasons, but I think we should lead with the book and then move into the other show.
00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:18.240
Yeah.
00:02:18.319 --> 00:02:19.520
I mean, I this is news to me.
00:02:19.599 --> 00:02:23.039
I when you told me about it, I was like, oh, I'm looking forward to this, actually.
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:29.039
I I want to talk about the title and then just kind of move from there, Mike, because I think this is so interesting.
00:02:29.199 --> 00:02:32.560
I just was reading it to Brian and I even read it, how it reads.
00:02:32.719 --> 00:02:34.560
So the greatest song ever?
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:36.240
It's a question, right?
00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:37.520
And I think that's so cool.
00:02:37.680 --> 00:02:39.360
The sub, what do you call that, Mike?
00:02:39.439 --> 00:02:40.639
The the title under the title.
00:02:40.879 --> 00:02:41.280
Subtitle.
00:02:41.599 --> 00:02:48.719
Subtitle, an in-depth analysis of incredible songs with the ultimate goal of finding the greatest ever.
00:02:48.960 --> 00:02:51.840
I want to hear Mike's explanation of greatest.
00:02:51.919 --> 00:02:55.599
Like, is there a formula to this or am I just overthinking it?
00:02:55.840 --> 00:02:57.520
You know, there's no formula, Brian.
00:02:57.680 --> 00:03:01.039
To me, a great song hits you in the feels.
00:03:01.439 --> 00:03:10.159
Whether that's, you know, makes you motivated and makes you feel like you can run through a wall or leaves you sobbing in tears because it was so sad or anything.
00:03:10.319 --> 00:03:13.280
To me, a great song really has to hit you in the feels.
00:03:13.439 --> 00:03:16.240
And I think I make that point many, many times in this book.
00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:21.120
How a song can move you if you really listen to it closely and understand the lyrics.
00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:26.560
So you had to take off the DJ hat to put this list together, or was that part of the equation at all?
00:03:26.879 --> 00:03:28.479
You know, that's a great question, Brian.
00:03:28.639 --> 00:03:36.879
I obviously doing this for as long as I do, I understand the reaction that certain certain songs have to crowds, and that's an important thing as well.
00:03:37.039 --> 00:03:42.800
But I think some DJs only define music by will it rock my dance floor or not.
00:03:42.960 --> 00:03:46.400
You know, we saw that when Taylor Swift just released her latest album.
00:03:46.560 --> 00:03:52.560
The biggest reaction, the biggest comments I saw from DJ friends of mine was, Oh, I don't hear anything that's gonna work at my gigs.
00:03:52.639 --> 00:03:55.280
All right, but that's not the only thing that music can do.
00:03:55.759 --> 00:03:58.400
I don't know you as well as I know Joe Brian.
00:03:58.639 --> 00:04:09.840
I don't know how much you love music outside of just playing at events, but I know Joe and I share that passion for, you know, Joe, you go to plenty of concerts, and those artists aren't artists that you play at your events, right?
00:04:10.080 --> 00:04:15.199
Because you have an appreciation for music as a whole and the fact that some is danceable, some isn't.
00:04:15.439 --> 00:04:25.680
So to answer the question, I took my DJ hat off a little bit, but I kept it on because great dance songs are also a subdivision of great music, and I appreciate great dance songs as much as the next person.
00:04:25.920 --> 00:04:27.600
All right, one more pre-qualifier question.
00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:32.879
So some songs move you in a moment, but then years later, maybe that wanes a bit.
00:04:32.959 --> 00:04:34.079
It doesn't have the same effect.
00:04:34.319 --> 00:04:40.879
So is part of the equation if it still moves you, or it just had its moment and now it's gone.
00:04:41.279 --> 00:04:51.040
I can only write this book from my perspective as a middle-aged man who's you know dealing with looking at 60 next year and the other issues in my life.
00:04:51.199 --> 00:04:54.720
And one song specifically that I can think of, I talk about that.
00:04:54.879 --> 00:05:06.720
The it hits me differently than it did 30 years ago or 40 years ago when I first heard it, because I'm coming at it from a perspective now of a middle-aged man as opposed to when I first heard it, I was a kid.
00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:15.360
So um, yeah, that absolutely songs hit you in different I mean, any art form hits you in a different way depending on where you are in your life.
00:05:15.759 --> 00:05:22.319
So to work your way up the list, if it has held on longevity-wise, does that help move it up the list of numbers?
00:05:22.480 --> 00:05:23.680
I mean, is it okay?
00:05:23.839 --> 00:05:24.319
It's yeah.
00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:28.160
I listen, I think that's one of the defining factors of great songs.
00:05:28.319 --> 00:05:37.279
There's a lot of, and they're usually pop songs that you love when you first hear it, and then five listens, ten listens later, you're like, meh, that song's not great.
00:05:37.439 --> 00:05:42.240
And conversely, I think most great songs don't grab you right away.
00:05:42.720 --> 00:05:48.879
That it takes a while to kind of bury into your soul, and then you start going, oh wow, that's a really great song.
00:05:48.959 --> 00:05:50.959
I get what the artist is trying to do there.
00:05:51.120 --> 00:05:54.319
It didn't come to you immediately, but it took a while for it to really grasp you.
00:05:54.560 --> 00:05:55.439
You might have to ask another one.
00:05:55.519 --> 00:05:55.920
Yeah, sorry.
00:05:57.199 --> 00:05:58.560
How many did you put in the book?
00:05:58.720 --> 00:05:59.120
40.
00:05:59.439 --> 00:06:02.560
And they are ranked in that way, or no?
00:06:02.639 --> 00:06:12.560
It's just no, I I I point this out in the book that the first 39, I honestly put them into a Spotify playlist, I hit random, and I put the songs in that order.
00:06:12.879 --> 00:06:20.800
And I did that specifically for the first 39 because I I thought about doing chronological order, I thought about doing alphabetical order, but I just wanted some random effect.
00:06:21.120 --> 00:06:27.120
The 40th one I did save for the fact that you put a gun to my head and say what's the greatest song ever?
00:06:27.279 --> 00:06:29.199
It would be the 40th song that I write about.
00:06:29.279 --> 00:06:34.720
I think the first 39 are all great and deserve consideration as the greatest song ever.
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:38.480
But if you forced me to decide, it would be the 40th one that I read.
00:06:38.879 --> 00:06:39.519
And you gotta read the book.
00:06:39.680 --> 00:06:40.720
So I saved that one specifically.
00:06:40.879 --> 00:06:41.519
And you gotta read the book.
00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:42.240
You gotta read the book.
00:06:42.560 --> 00:06:43.279
Damn right, you did.
00:06:44.480 --> 00:06:49.600
So was there any honorable mention ones, or was it easy to come up with this list of top 39?
00:06:49.839 --> 00:06:50.639
No, it wasn't.
00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:55.040
As a matter of fact, I thought about putting this in the in an addendum, but I I just didn't do it.
00:06:55.279 --> 00:07:02.240
There were over 200 songs that I listened to and considered and researched and really gave some soul searching about.
00:07:02.319 --> 00:07:08.399
So from over 200, I've narrowed this down to what I consider to be 40 of the greatest songs.
00:07:08.639 --> 00:07:09.360
That's amazing.
00:07:09.519 --> 00:07:12.160
Can I can I put this word in a fucking interview?
00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:19.199
Can I do you mind if I ask my mentor and and uh the legend a couple of questions?
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:19.759
Is that okay?
00:07:20.240 --> 00:07:20.800
Cool, cool.
00:07:21.040 --> 00:07:24.079
Um, so Mike, you are an author.
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:26.560
Like you've put out multiple books now.
00:07:26.720 --> 00:07:28.079
It's kind of run the gamut.
00:07:28.399 --> 00:07:33.759
Originally you'd made a lot of um uh let's call them video books or instructional things for DJs.
00:07:33.920 --> 00:07:36.480
The last book, is it on this day in music?
00:07:36.720 --> 00:07:37.360
Am I saying it right?
00:07:37.600 --> 00:07:38.399
On this date in music.
00:07:38.639 --> 00:07:41.920
On this date, I remember that's right, because you couldn't get the URL or something.
00:07:42.000 --> 00:07:48.319
On this date in music, which I used ad nauseum for multiple TikToks over the years.
00:07:48.560 --> 00:07:49.759
What brought on this concept?
00:07:49.839 --> 00:07:51.199
Like, how do you parlay from it?
00:07:51.360 --> 00:07:57.759
And by the way, just for the listeners that aren't familiar with that book, and I'm sure you can go out there and get it still on Amazon on this date in music.
00:07:57.920 --> 00:08:11.519
It was awesome because every day of the year, 365 days, Mike basically pulled a song and associated it with that date and then told the story behind it, and it was still is sitting on my coffee table.
00:08:11.680 --> 00:08:12.399
No, it's right there.
00:08:13.279 --> 00:08:14.399
I knew it was somewhere near me.
00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:15.519
It's right here between us.
00:08:15.600 --> 00:08:16.560
It sits right here between us.
00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:17.519
There it is, right there.
00:08:18.560 --> 00:08:20.000
And here it is, right here between us.
00:08:20.079 --> 00:08:23.920
So it sits here on the table as a reminder of where we came from.
00:08:24.079 --> 00:08:26.319
But how do you parlay from that book to this book?
00:08:26.399 --> 00:08:28.079
How does this come about, this concept?
00:08:28.480 --> 00:08:42.559
This latest book, The Greatest Song Ever, is actually inspired by On The State in Music because a friend of mine recently online said he loved On the State in Music, but he said you really didn't offer many opinions about the songs.
00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:43.679
And I didn't.
00:08:43.759 --> 00:08:49.759
It's a very factual book, and you know, this happened on this date, and here's an interesting thing that happened behind the scenes or whatever.
00:08:49.919 --> 00:08:55.440
But I didn't offer a lot of, and this song is great because, or this album is worth listening to because.
00:08:55.600 --> 00:09:01.679
And so I thought, hmm, I wonder if there's any value in just offering almost like a music critic, which is funny.
00:09:01.759 --> 00:09:06.240
I call myself that on the back of the book because there's no true definition of what a music critic is.
00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:09.039
You don't have to have everything a lawyer that you have to have passed apart.
00:09:09.360 --> 00:09:11.279
So yeah, I'm gonna use that title for myself.
00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:12.639
I think I'm a music critic.
00:09:12.799 --> 00:09:16.960
You are, and I think my opinion is of value, and not that everyone's gonna agree with that.
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:25.440
I'm sure most people are gonna read this book and disagree with certain songs that I put in and say, Oh, I can't believe you didn't put this, but that's part of the fun of any kind of list like this, right?
00:09:25.600 --> 00:09:27.679
The things you agree with and the things you disagree with.
00:09:27.919 --> 00:09:35.600
So it was more about taking some of the facts from On the State and Music, but also offering my opinion about what makes the song so great.
00:09:35.840 --> 00:09:48.639
So speaking of, do you factor in or you know, put in this equation, this this Mike Walter formula, melody, rhythm, lyrics, all of the above, or do you focus on one thing?
00:09:48.720 --> 00:09:52.080
Or even like Brian was saying, like, do people throw ass to it?
00:09:52.159 --> 00:09:52.720
You know what I mean?
00:09:52.879 --> 00:09:53.759
Shake their ass to it?
00:09:54.080 --> 00:09:57.120
All of the above, but melody and rhythm are extremely important.
00:09:57.200 --> 00:10:04.799
But if if the lyrics don't hit me and hit me hard, and again, it doesn't have to be emotional, it can be that shaking your ass on the dance floor.
00:10:04.879 --> 00:10:13.440
I mean, there are a number of songs in here that we'll all know as gig songs because they get the dance floor moving, but that isn't the only deciding factor for me about what makes a great song.
00:10:13.600 --> 00:10:16.480
And to me, the lyrics just have to get me somehow.
00:10:16.639 --> 00:10:23.039
They have to make me go or wow or yeah, or just some kind of reaction from what the writer wrote.
00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:26.639
I mean, you also know I released a book of poetry uh about a year ago.
00:10:26.720 --> 00:10:29.039
I've made a whopping like$40 off of that.
00:10:29.120 --> 00:10:29.840
It was amazing.
00:10:30.320 --> 00:10:31.440
Nobody buys poetry.
00:10:31.679 --> 00:10:41.919
And I actually talk about that in the forward of this book that I've always believed music is a gateway to get people to read poetry or listen to poetry or be moved by poetry.
00:10:42.080 --> 00:10:45.200
I happen to read a lot of books of poetry, but most people don't do that.
00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:49.519
But when you listen to lyrics, it's really like appreciating poetry.
00:10:50.240 --> 00:11:01.360
You were kind of one of the people that we talked about it on the on the old podcast where you know you're riding around in the car and for whatever reason, let's say you're on a throwback station and Brick House comes on, you're like, oh no, I can't do that one.
00:11:01.440 --> 00:11:01.919
You know what I mean?
00:11:02.080 --> 00:11:02.639
Gig songs.
00:11:02.720 --> 00:11:06.240
How many of the 40 would you put into that category of gig songs?
00:11:06.320 --> 00:11:06.960
Shit, we play.
00:11:07.120 --> 00:11:10.399
I would say September is definitely a a gig song, right?
00:11:10.720 --> 00:11:11.039
100%.
00:11:11.360 --> 00:11:12.480
So that's that's covered in it.
00:11:12.720 --> 00:11:13.679
It's his favorite, it's his opener.
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:16.559
Uh Respect, Aretha Franklin.
00:11:16.639 --> 00:11:17.840
Would you consider that song?
00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:18.399
Yeah, I do.
00:11:18.639 --> 00:11:19.919
Would you consider Usher?
00:11:20.080 --> 00:11:20.320
Yeah.
00:11:20.639 --> 00:11:21.759
100% a gig song.
00:11:22.159 --> 00:11:22.480
Not at all.
00:11:22.879 --> 00:11:23.440
Just kidding.
00:11:23.600 --> 00:11:23.919
Yeah.
00:11:24.159 --> 00:11:25.039
That's three.
00:11:25.200 --> 00:11:27.200
I think those are probably the only.
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:29.840
Oh, I talk about hypnotize by Biggie.
00:11:29.919 --> 00:11:31.759
That to me is one of the greatest rap songs.
00:11:31.919 --> 00:11:32.960
I just love everything.
00:11:33.279 --> 00:11:37.440
I didn't agree more song, and I delve into the lyrics of that and I delve into the legacy of that.
00:11:37.519 --> 00:11:39.519
So yeah, probably four, maybe five.
00:11:39.759 --> 00:11:44.639
Did you find yourself sticking with one genre primarily, or it kept coming reoccurring?
00:11:44.799 --> 00:11:46.799
Like there's actually a singer-songwriter genre.
00:11:46.960 --> 00:11:51.679
I'm surprised that that wouldn't dominate because the lyrical content is usually so poignant.
00:11:51.919 --> 00:11:52.720
Yes, that's the word.
00:11:52.879 --> 00:11:53.120
Thank you.
00:11:53.279 --> 00:11:53.600
Great word.
00:11:53.840 --> 00:11:54.799
I did my best, Brian.
00:11:54.879 --> 00:11:59.759
Just like on this date in music, I did my best to spread the love throughout different eras.
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:02.799
The oldest song in this book goes back to the 1930s.
00:12:02.879 --> 00:12:05.039
The most recent is just two years ago.
00:12:05.360 --> 00:12:10.080
So I tried to spread the love through different timelines and but also genres.
00:12:10.159 --> 00:12:14.159
There's country song, hip-hop, rock, folk, singer-songwriter.
00:12:14.240 --> 00:12:16.240
There I tried to cover as many genres as possible.
00:12:16.559 --> 00:12:17.039
Follow-up.
00:12:17.120 --> 00:12:19.840
Did one artist seem to dominate?
00:12:20.399 --> 00:12:21.600
Only one per artist.
00:12:21.679 --> 00:12:23.759
And listen, everyone knows me as a Prince fan.
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:26.799
Of course, there's a Prince song in here, but only one.
00:12:27.039 --> 00:12:31.039
Probably the only artist that you could say is represented twice.
00:12:31.120 --> 00:12:34.559
I have a Beatles song and also a solo John Lennon song.
00:12:34.720 --> 00:12:41.600
So you might say I overweighed the Beatles a little bit, but I think if any band deserves to be overweighed in a book like this, it's the Beatles.
00:12:41.759 --> 00:12:49.039
So talk about avoiding like the cliches or how do you avoid the Stairway to Heaven or Bohemian Rhapsody?
00:12:49.279 --> 00:12:49.840
Or maybe you didn't.
00:12:49.919 --> 00:12:50.159
I don't know.
00:12:50.240 --> 00:12:50.639
Maybe they're in there.
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:53.360
I only have a chance to glance at it.
00:12:53.679 --> 00:12:54.559
But here's my thing, Joe.
00:12:54.879 --> 00:13:03.360
First of all, I think that those songs have been given enough flowers through the years, written about, admired, adulted, everything else.
00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:05.759
But I don't think Stairway to Heaven is a great song.
00:13:05.840 --> 00:13:08.799
I know that might be sacrilege, but I think it's a very good song.
00:13:08.960 --> 00:13:10.159
I don't think it's a great song.
00:13:10.240 --> 00:13:11.679
I think it's a little over the top.
00:13:11.759 --> 00:13:13.360
I think it's a little self-indulgent.
00:13:13.440 --> 00:13:17.919
And I think Led Zeppelin has four or five better songs than Stairway to Heaven, in my opinion.
00:13:18.320 --> 00:13:20.080
I feel the same way about Bohemian Rhapsody.
00:13:20.399 --> 00:13:22.559
I think Bohemian Rhapsody is a great song.
00:13:22.720 --> 00:13:25.120
In my opinion, it's not even the best Queen song.
00:13:25.200 --> 00:13:28.799
And I just think it suffers a little bit from overexposure, if you will.
00:13:29.039 --> 00:13:30.080
I mean, I couldn't agree more.
00:13:30.159 --> 00:13:37.919
As somebody that really likes both of those bands and listens to songs even to this day and all through high school, you know, stuff that came out way before my time.
00:13:38.000 --> 00:13:38.320
I don't know.
00:13:38.639 --> 00:13:45.360
Not way before my time, but before my time, I would still pick three, four songs from Zeppelin or Queen before I would pick either one of those.
00:13:45.519 --> 00:13:49.279
But yes, they have been written to death, played to death, talked about to death.
00:13:49.440 --> 00:13:52.080
I mean, movies made about the songs, literally.
00:13:52.480 --> 00:13:55.600
Back in the day, there used to be a rock station in New York.
00:13:55.679 --> 00:13:57.919
I forget which one it was, maybe WNEW.
00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:04.080
And on I think it was July 4th, they would do like a top 500 countdown of the rock songs.
00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:05.360
And I loved listening to it.
00:14:05.440 --> 00:14:07.440
We would have barbecues and we'd have it on all day long.
00:14:07.679 --> 00:14:15.120
Once you got to the top 10, you could turn it off because you knew it was going to be some semblance of order of Baba O'Reilly and Stairway to Heaven.
00:14:15.840 --> 00:14:21.840
Like you pretty much knew, and again, not that those songs don't deserve to be in that placement, but maybe it's just overexposure to me.
00:14:22.000 --> 00:14:27.279
It wasn't hard for me to eliminate some of those cliche songs because they wouldn't have made my list even if I'd never heard them before.
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:34.000
Well, with the music that's out today, I mean, obviously, just my own personal opinion that great songwriting is starting to suffer.
00:14:34.159 --> 00:14:40.480
Do you carry that same take in the sense that music today, the emphasis on great songwriting isn't there?
00:14:40.639 --> 00:14:47.919
And on the flip side, are there any artists that are out there currently that you think could make a list like this come 10 years from now?
00:14:48.639 --> 00:14:49.360
Damn, that's good.
00:14:50.240 --> 00:14:51.759
I disagree with the first thing.
00:14:51.919 --> 00:14:55.840
The thing is that great songwriters are not represented on the pop charts anymore.